Skip to content

Fix outdated mention of ESTIMATE total count type#1814

Merged
nscuro merged 1 commit intomainfrom
nscuro-patch-1
Feb 27, 2026
Merged

Fix outdated mention of ESTIMATE total count type#1814
nscuro merged 1 commit intomainfrom
nscuro-patch-1

Conversation

@nscuro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nscuro nscuro commented Feb 27, 2026

Description

Fixes outdated mention of ESTIMATE total count type.

Addressed Issue

N/A

Additional Details

N/A

Checklist

  • I have read and understand the contributing guidelines
  • This PR fixes a defect, and I have provided tests to verify that the fix is effective
  • This PR implements an enhancement, and I have provided tests to verify that it works as intended
  • This PR introduces changes to the database model, and I have updated the migration changelog accordingly
  • This PR introduces new or alters existing behavior, and I have updated the documentation accordingly

Signed-off-by: Niklas <nscuro@protonmail.com>
@nscuro nscuro added this to the 5.7.0 milestone Feb 27, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 27, 2026 13:50
@nscuro nscuro added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 27, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes outdated API documentation that incorrectly mentioned an ESTIMATE total count type that no longer exists. The documentation now correctly describes only the two supported types: EXACT for exact counts and AT_LEAST for partial counts.

Changes:

  • Updated pagination documentation in OpenAPI spec to remove reference to non-existent ESTIMATE type and clarify the two actual types: EXACT and AT_LEAST

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@nscuro nscuro merged commit cb38df7 into main Feb 27, 2026
14 checks passed
@nscuro nscuro deleted the nscuro-patch-1 branch February 27, 2026 13:54
@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.01% (target: -1.00%) (target: 70.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (66bb711) 38005 31845 83.79%
Head commit (456bb1b) 38005 (+0) 31850 (+5) 83.80% (+0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#1814) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 30, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants